--- title: "Pathway activity inference in bulk RNA-seq" author: - name: Pau Badia-i-Mompel affiliation: - Heidelberg Universiy output: BiocStyle::html_document: self_contained: true toc: true toc_float: true toc_depth: 3 code_folding: show package: "`r pkg_ver('decoupleR')`" vignette: > %\VignetteIndexEntry{Pathway activity inference in bulk RNA-seq} %\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown} %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8} --- ```{r setup, include=FALSE} knitr::opts_chunk$set( collapse = TRUE, comment = "#>" ) ``` Bulk RNA-seq yield many molecular readouts that are hard to interpret by themselves. One way of summarizing this information is by inferring pathway activities from prior knowledge. In this notebook we showcase how to use `decoupleR` for pathway activity inference with a bulk RNA-seq data-set where the transcription factor FOXA2 was knocked out in pancreatic cancer cell lines. The data consists of 3 Wild Type (WT) samples and 3 Knock Outs (KO). They are freely available in [GEO](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE119931). # Loading packages First, we need to load the relevant packages: ```{r "load packages", message = FALSE} ## We load the required packages library(decoupleR) library(tidyverse) library(ggplot2) library(pheatmap) library(ggrepel) ``` # Loading the data-set Here we used an already processed bulk RNA-seq data-set. We provide the normalized log-transformed counts, the experimental design meta-data and the Differential Expressed Genes (DEGs) obtained using `limma`. We can open the data like this: ```{r "load data"} inputs_dir <- system.file("extdata", package = "decoupleR") data <- readRDS(file.path(inputs_dir, "bk_data.rds")) ``` From `data` we can extract the mentioned information. Here we see the normalized log-transformed counts: ```{r "counts"} # Remove NAs and set row names counts <- data$counts %>% dplyr::mutate_if(~ any(is.na(.x)), ~ if_else(is.na(.x),0,.x)) %>% column_to_rownames(var = "gene") %>% as.matrix() head(counts) ``` The design meta-data: ```{r "design"} design <- data$design design ``` And the results of `limma`, of which we are interested in extracting the obtained t-value from the contrast: ```{r "deg"} # Extract t-values per gene deg <- data$limma_ttop %>% select(ID, t) %>% filter(!is.na(t)) %>% column_to_rownames(var = "ID") %>% as.matrix() head(deg) ``` # PROGENy model [PROGENy](https://saezlab.github.io/progeny/) is a comprehensive resource containing a curated collection of pathways and their target genes, with weights for each interaction. For this example we will use the human weights (mouse is also available) and we will use the top 100 responsive genes ranked by p-value. We can use `decoupleR` to retrieve it from `OmniPath`: ```{r "progeny", message=FALSE} net <- get_progeny(organism = 'human', top = 100) net ``` # Activity inference with Weighted Mean To infer activities we will run the Weighted Mean method (`wmean`). It infers regulator activities by first multiplying each target feature by its associated weight which then are summed to an enrichment score `wmean`. Furthermore, permutations of random target features can be performed to obtain a null distribution that can be used to compute a z-score `norm_wmean`, or a corrected estimate `corr_wmean` by multiplying `wmean` by the minus log10 of the obtained empirical p-value. In this example we use `wmean` but we could have used any other. To see what methods are available use `show_methods()`. To run `decoupleR` methods, we need an input matrix (`mat`), an input prior knowledge network/resource (`net`), and the name of the columns of net that we want to use. ```{r "sample_wmean", message=FALSE} # Run wmean sample_acts <- run_wmean(mat=counts, net=net, .source='source', .target='target', .mor='weight', times = 100, minsize = 5) sample_acts ``` # Visualization From the obtained results, we will select the `norm_wmean` activities and we will observe the obtained activities per sample in a heat-map: ```{r "heatmap"} # Transform to wide matrix sample_acts_mat <- sample_acts %>% filter(statistic == 'norm_wmean') %>% pivot_wider(id_cols = 'condition', names_from = 'source', values_from = 'score') %>% column_to_rownames('condition') %>% as.matrix() # Scale per sample sample_acts_mat <- scale(sample_acts_mat) # Choose color palette palette_length = 100 my_color = colorRampPalette(c("Darkblue", "white","red"))(palette_length) my_breaks <- c(seq(-3, 0, length.out=ceiling(palette_length/2) + 1), seq(0.05, 3, length.out=floor(palette_length/2))) # Plot pheatmap(sample_acts_mat, border_color = NA, color=my_color, breaks = my_breaks) ``` We can observe that WT samples have higher activities for p53 and TGFb than KO. On the other hand, KO show higher activities for MAPK and PI3K. We can also infer pathway activities from the t-values of the DEGs between KO and WT: ```{r "contrast_wmean", message=FALSE} # Run wmean contrast_acts <- run_wmean(mat=deg, net=net, .source='source', .target='target', .mor='weight', times = 100, minsize = 5) contrast_acts ``` We select the `norm_wmean` activities and then we show the changes in activity between KO and WT: ```{r "barplot"} # Filter norm_wmean f_contrast_acts <- contrast_acts %>% filter(statistic == 'norm_wmean') # Plot ggplot(f_contrast_acts, aes(x = reorder(source, score), y = score)) + geom_bar(aes(fill = score), stat = "identity") + scale_fill_gradient2(low = "darkblue", high = "indianred", mid = "whitesmoke", midpoint = 0) + theme_minimal() + theme(axis.title = element_text(face = "bold", size = 12), axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 45, hjust = 1, size =10, face= "bold"), axis.text.y = element_text(size =10, face= "bold"), panel.grid.major = element_blank(), panel.grid.minor = element_blank()) + xlab("Pathways") ``` As observed before, the pathways p53 and TGFb are deactivated in KO when compared to WT, while JAK-STAT and others seem to be activated. We can further visualize the most responsive genes in each pathway along their t-values to interpret the results. For example, let's see the genes that are belong to the MAPK pathway: ```{r "targets"} pathway <- 'MAPK' df <- net %>% filter(source == pathway) %>% arrange(target) %>% mutate(ID = target, color = "3") %>% column_to_rownames('target') inter <- sort(intersect(rownames(deg),rownames(df))) df <- df[inter, ] df['t_value'] <- deg[inter, ] df <- df %>% mutate(color = if_else(weight > 0 & t_value > 0, '1', color)) %>% mutate(color = if_else(weight > 0 & t_value < 0, '2', color)) %>% mutate(color = if_else(weight < 0 & t_value > 0, '2', color)) %>% mutate(color = if_else(weight < 0 & t_value < 0, '1', color)) ggplot(df, aes(x = weight, y = t_value, color = color)) + geom_point() + scale_colour_manual(values = c("red","royalblue3","grey")) + geom_label_repel(aes(label = ID)) + theme_minimal() + theme(legend.position = "none") + geom_vline(xintercept = 0, linetype = 'dotted') + geom_hline(yintercept = 0, linetype = 'dotted') + ggtitle(pathway) ``` The pathway seems to be active since the majority of target genes with positive weights have positive t-values (1st quadrant), and the majority of the ones with negative weights have negative t-values (3d quadrant). # Session information ```{r session_info, echo=FALSE} options(width = 120) sessioninfo::session_info() ```